Files
dance-lessons-coach/adr/0001-go-1.26.1-standard.md
Gabriel Radureau db09d0ace1 📝 docs(adr): homogenize all 23 ADR headers to canonical format
Audit 2026-05-02 (Tâche 6 Phase A) had identified 3 inconsistent
formats across the ADR corpus :
- F1 list bullets : `* Status:` / `* Date:` / `* Deciders:` (11 ADRs)
- F2 bold fields : `**Status:**` / `**Date:**` / `**Authors:**` (9 ADRs)
- F3 dedicated section : `## Status\n**Value** ` (5 ADRs)

Mixed metadata names (Authors / Deciders / Decision Date / Implementation
Date / Implementation Status / Last Updated) and decorative emojis on
status values made the corpus hard to scan or template against.

Canonical format adopted (see adr/README.md for full template) :
    # NN. Title

    **Status:** <Proposed|Accepted|Implemented|Partially Implemented|
                  Approved|Rejected|Deferred|Deprecated|Superseded by ADR-NNNN>
    **Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
    **Authors:** Name(s)
    [optional **Field:** ... lines]

    ## Context...

Transformations applied (via /tmp/homogenize-adrs.py) :
- F1 list bullets → bold fields
- F2 cleanup : `**Deciders:**` → `**Authors:**`, strip status emojis
- F3 sections : `## Status\n**Value** ` → `**Status:** Value`
- Strip decorative emojis from `**Status:**` and `**Implementation Status:**`
- Convert any `* Implementation Status:` / `* Last Updated:` /
  `* Decision Drivers:` / `* Decision Date:` to bold equivalents
- Date typo fix : `2024-04-XX` → `2026-04-XX` for ADRs 0018, 0019
  (already noted in PR #17 but here re-applied since branch starts
  from origin/main pre-PR17)
- Normalize multiple blank lines after header (max 1)

21 / 23 ADRs modified. 0010 and 0012 were already conform.
0011 and 0014 do not exist in the repo (cf. README index update).

Body content of each ADR is preserved unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-03 00:27:42 +02:00

1.5 KiB

Use Go 1.26.1 as the standard Go version

Status: Accepted Authors: Gabriel Radureau, AI Agent Date: 2026-04-01

Context and Problem Statement

We needed to choose a Go version for the dance-lessons-coach project that provides:

  • Stability and long-term support
  • Access to modern language features
  • Good ecosystem compatibility
  • Security updates

Decision Drivers

  • Project requires modern Go features
  • Need for good dependency compatibility
  • Desire for long-term support
  • Team familiarity with recent Go versions

Considered Options

  • Go 1.25.x - Latest stable version at project start
  • Go 1.26.1 - Newer version with additional features
  • Go 1.24.x - More widely adopted but older

Decision Outcome

Chosen option: "Go 1.26.1" because it provides the best balance of modern features, stability, and ecosystem support.

Pros and Cons of the Options

Go 1.26.1

  • Good, because provides access to latest language improvements
  • Good, because includes recent security fixes
  • Good, because has better performance optimizations
  • Bad, because slightly less battle-tested than older versions

Go 1.25.x

  • Good, because widely adopted
  • Good, because very stable
  • Bad, because missing some newer features
  • Bad, because would need upgrade sooner

Go 1.24.x

  • Good, because extremely stable
  • Bad, because lacks modern features
  • Bad, because security updates ending soon