Files
dance-lessons-coach/adr/0015-cli-subcommands-cobra.md
Gabriel Radureau a24b4fdb3b 📝 docs(adr): homogenize 23 ADRs + rewrite README (Tâche 7 migration) (#18)
## Summary

Homogenize all 23 ADRs to a single canonical header format, and rewrite `adr/README.md` to match the actual state of the corpus.

This is **Tâche 7** of the ARCODANGE Phase 1 migration (Claude Code → Mistral Vibe). Independent from PR #17 (Tâche 6 — restructure AGENTS.md) — both can merge in any order. No code changes; only documentation.

## Changes

### 1. Homogenize 21 ADR headers (commit `db09d0a`)

The audit (Tâche 6 Phase A, Mistral intent-router agent, 2026-05-02) had identified **3 inconsistent header formats** :

- **F1** — list bullets (`* Status:` / `* Date:` / `* Deciders:`) : 11 ADRs (0001-0008, 0011, 0014, 0023)
- **F2** — bold fields (`**Status:**` / `**Date:**` / `**Authors:**`) : 9 ADRs (0009, 0010, 0012, 0013, 0015, 0016, 0017, 0018, 0019)
- **F3** — dedicated section (`## Status\n**Value** `) : 5 ADRs (0020, 0021, 0022, 0024, 0025)

Plus mixed metadata names (Authors / Deciders / Decision Date / Implementation Date / Implementation Status / Last Updated) and decorative emojis on status values made the corpus hard to scan or template against.

**Canonical format adopted** (see `adr/README.md` for full template) :

```markdown
# NN. Title

**Status:** <Proposed | Accepted | Implemented | Partially Implemented | Approved | Rejected | Deferred | Deprecated | Superseded by ADR-NNNN>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Authors:** Name(s)

[optional **Field:** ... lines]

## Context...
```

**Transformations applied** (via `/tmp/homogenize-adrs.py` script, 23 files scanned, 21 modified — 0010 and 0012 were already conform) :

- F1 list bullets → bold fields
- F2 cleanup : `**Deciders:**` → `**Authors:**`, strip status emojis
- F3 sections : `## Status\n**Value** ` → `**Status:** Value` (single line)
- Strip decorative emojis from `**Status:**` and `**Implementation Status:**`
- Convert `* Last Updated:` / `* Implementation Status:` / `* Decision Drivers:` / `* Decision Date:` to bold
- Date typo fix : `2024-04-XX` → `2026-04-XX` for ADRs 0018, 0019 (off-by-2-years in original)
- Normalize multiple blank lines after header (max 1)

**ADR body content is preserved unchanged.** Only headers transformed.

### 2. Rewrite `adr/README.md` (commit `d64ab02`)

Previous README had multiple inconsistencies :

- Index table listed wrong titles for ADRs 0010-0021 (looked like an aspirational forecast that never matched reality — e.g. "0011 = Trunk-Based Development" but real 0011 is absent and Trunk-Based Development is actually 0017)
- Listed entries for ADRs 0011 (validation library) and 0014 (gRPC) but **these files do not exist** in the repo
- 0024 (BDD Test Organization) was missing from the detail list
- Template still showed the obsolete F1 format (`* Status:`)
- Decorative emojis on every status entry

Rewrite :

- Index table **regenerated from actual file contents** (title from H1, status from `**Status:**` line) — emoji-free, accurate
- Notes that 0011 / 0014 are not currently in use (reserved)
- Updated template block matches the canonical format
- Status Legend extended with `Approved`, `Partially Implemented`, `Deferred`
- Added note that 0026 is the next free number for new ADRs

## Test plan

- [x] All 23 ADRs follow `**Status:**` / `**Date:**` / `**Authors:**` (verified via grep)
- [x] No more occurrences of `* Status:` (F1) or `## Status` (F3) in any ADR header
- [x] No more emojis on `**Status:**` lines
- [x] `adr/README.md` index links resolve to existing files (no more 0011 / 0014 dead links)
- [x] Pre-commit hooks pass (`go mod tidy`, `go fmt`, `swag fmt`)

## Migration context

Part of Phase 1 of the ARCODANGE migration from Claude Code to Mistral Vibe. Tâche 7 of the curriculum.

Independent from PR #17 (which restructures `AGENTS.md`). The two PRs touch disjoint files — no merge conflict expected when both are merged.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) (Opus 4.7, 1M context). Mistral Vibe (intent-router agent / mistral-medium-3.5) did the original audit identifying the 3 formats during Tâche 6 Phase A.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Mistral Vibe (devstral-2 / mistral-medium-3.5)
Reviewed-on: #18
Co-authored-by: Gabriel Radureau <arcodange@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: Gabriel Radureau <arcodange@gmail.com>
2026-05-03 11:01:13 +02:00

228 lines
7.3 KiB
Markdown

# 15. CLI Subcommands and Flag Management with Cobra
**Date:** 2026-04-05
**Status:** Implemented
**Authors:** Arcodange Team
**Decision Date:** 2026-04-05
**Implementation Status:** Phase 1 Complete
## Context
As dance-lessons-coach grows, we need a more robust and maintainable CLI structure. Currently, we use simple flag parsing (`--version`), but this approach has limitations:
1. **Limited scalability**: Adding more commands/flags becomes messy
2. **Poor user experience**: No built-in help, completion, or validation
3. **Hard to maintain**: Manual flag parsing is error-prone
4. **No subcommands**: Can't easily add commands like `server start`, `server stop`, etc.
## Decision Drivers
* **Scalability**: Support growing CLI needs as project expands
* **User Experience**: Provide professional CLI with help, completion, validation
* **Maintainability**: Easy to add/remove commands and flags
* **Standards**: Follow industry best practices for CLI tools
* **Extensibility**: Support future commands (migrate, seed, etc.)
* **Integration**: Work well with existing config system
## Decision
We will adopt **Cobra** as our CLI framework. Cobra is a mature, widely-used library for building modern CLI applications in Go.
### Selected Solution: Cobra CLI Framework
**Repository**: https://github.com/spf13/cobra
**Version**: v1.8.0 (or latest stable)
### Key Features
1. **Subcommands**: `server start`, `server stop`, `migrate`, etc.
2. **Flags**: `--config`, `--env`, `--verbose`, etc.
3. **Help System**: Automatic `--help` generation
4. **Shell Completion**: Built-in support
5. **Validation**: Type-safe flag parsing
6. **Middleware**: Pre/post command hooks
### Implementation Plan
#### Phase 1: Basic Integration (✅ COMPLETED)
**Implemented in:** `cmd/cli/main.go`
```go
var rootCmd = &cobra.Command{
Use: "dance-lessons-coach",
Short: "dance-lessons-coach - API server and CLI tools",
Long: `dance-lessons-coach provides greeting services and API management.
To begin working with dance-lessons-coach, run:
dance-lessons-coach server --help`,
SilenceUsage: true,
}
var versionCmd = &cobra.Command{
Use: "version",
Short: "Print version information",
Run: func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) {
fmt.Println(version.Full())
},
}
var serverCmd = &cobra.Command{
Use: "server",
Short: "Start the dance-lessons-coach server",
Run: func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) {
// Load config and start server
cfg, err := config.LoadConfig()
if err != nil {
log.Fatal().Err(err).Msg("Failed to load configuration")
}
server := server.NewServer(cfg, context.Background())
if err := server.Run(); err != nil {
log.Fatal().Err(err).Msg("Server failed")
}
},
}
var greetCmd = &cobra.Command{
Use: "greet [name]",
Short: "Greet someone by name",
Args: cobra.MaximumNArgs(1),
Run: func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) {
name := ""
if len(args) > 0 {
name = args[0]
}
fmt.Printf("Hello %s!\n", name)
},
}
func init() {
rootCmd.AddCommand(versionCmd)
rootCmd.AddCommand(serverCmd)
rootCmd.AddCommand(greetCmd)
// Add flags to server command
serverCmd.Flags().String("config", "", "Config file path")
serverCmd.Flags().String("env", "", "Environment (dev, staging, prod)")
serverCmd.Flags().Bool("debug", false, "Enable debug logging")
}
func main() {
if err := rootCmd.Execute(); err != nil {
log.Fatal().Err(err).Msg("CLI execution failed")
}
}
```
**Current Commands:**
- `version`: Print version information
- `server`: Start the dance-lessons-coach server
- `greet [name]`: Greet someone by name
- `help`: Built-in help system
- `completion`: Shell completion scripts (automatic)
**Current Flags:**
- `--config`: Config file path (server command)
- `--env`: Environment (dev, staging, prod) (server command)
- `--debug`: Enable debug logging (server command)
- `--help`: Help for any command (built-in)
#### Phase 2: Advanced Features (Future)
- **Subcommand groups**: `server`, `db`, `migrate`, `tools`
- **Persistent flags**: Global flags like `--config`, `--env`
- **Command aliases**: Shorter command names
- **Custom help templates**: Branded help output
- **Shell completion scripts**: Generate completion for bash/zsh/fish
#### Phase 3: Migration (Ongoing)
- Migrate existing flags to Cobra
- Deprecate old flag parsing
- Update documentation
- Add new commands as needed
### Migration Strategy
1. **Incremental adoption**: Start with version command, then server command
2. **Backward compatibility**: Support old flags during transition
3. **Documentation**: Update README with new CLI usage
4. **Testing**: Ensure all existing functionality works
### Command Structure Proposal
```bash
# Main commands
dance-lessons-coach server # Start the server
dance-lessons-coach version # Show version
dance-lessons-coach migrate # Database migrations
dance-lessons-coach config # Config management
# Server subcommands
dance-lessons-coach server start # Start server
dance-lessons-coach server stop # Stop server
dance-lessons-coach server restart # Restart server
dance-lessons-coach server status # Server status
# Global flags
dance-lessons-coach --help # Show help
dance-lessons-coach --version # Show version (shortcut)
dance-lessons-coach --config /path/to/config.yaml
# Example usage
dance-lessons-coach server start --env production --debug
dance-lessons-coach migrate up
dance-lessons-coach config validate
```
### Pros and Cons of Cobra
#### ✅ Advantages
1. **Industry Standard**: Used by Kubernetes, Hugo, etcd, and many others
2. **Mature Ecosystem**: Well-documented, widely adopted
3. **Feature Rich**: Help, completion, validation built-in
4. **Extensible**: Easy to add new commands
5. **Go Idiomatic**: Fits well with Go patterns
6. **Good Documentation**: Excellent docs and examples
#### ❌ Disadvantages
1. **Learning Curve**: New patterns to learn
2. **Migration Effort**: Need to refactor existing code
3. **Slight Overhead**: More complex than simple flag parsing
4. **Dependency**: Adds cobra to project
### Validation
**Does this meet our requirements?**
-**Scalability**: Easy to add new commands
-**User Experience**: Professional CLI with help/completion
-**Maintainability**: Clean, structured code
-**Standards**: Follows industry best practices
-**Extensibility**: Supports future growth
-**Integration**: Works with existing config system
**What's still needed?**
-**Implementation**: Actual cobra integration (Phase 1 complete)
-**Migration**: Move existing flags to cobra (Phase 2)
-**Documentation**: Update docs with new CLI (Phase 2)
-**Testing**: Ensure all functionality works (Phase 2)
### Future Enhancements
1. **Add more commands**: `migrate`, `config`, `db`, etc.
2. **Improve help**: Custom templates, examples
3. **Add completion**: Shell completion scripts
4. **Enhance validation**: Better error messages
5. **Add aliases**: Shorter command names
### References
- [Cobra GitHub](https://github.com/spf13/cobra)
- [Cobra Documentation](https://cobra.dev/)
- [CLI Guidelines](https://clig.dev/)
- [Go CLI Best Practices](https://github.com/clig-dev/clig)
---
**Status:** Proposed
**Next Review:** 2026-04-12
**Implementation Owner:** Arcodange Team
**Approvers Needed:** @gabrielradureau