## Summary Homogenize all 23 ADRs to a single canonical header format, and rewrite `adr/README.md` to match the actual state of the corpus. This is **Tâche 7** of the ARCODANGE Phase 1 migration (Claude Code → Mistral Vibe). Independent from PR #17 (Tâche 6 — restructure AGENTS.md) — both can merge in any order. No code changes; only documentation. ## Changes ### 1. Homogenize 21 ADR headers (commit `db09d0a`) The audit (Tâche 6 Phase A, Mistral intent-router agent, 2026-05-02) had identified **3 inconsistent header formats** : - **F1** — list bullets (`* Status:` / `* Date:` / `* Deciders:`) : 11 ADRs (0001-0008, 0011, 0014, 0023) - **F2** — bold fields (`**Status:**` / `**Date:**` / `**Authors:**`) : 9 ADRs (0009, 0010, 0012, 0013, 0015, 0016, 0017, 0018, 0019) - **F3** — dedicated section (`## Status\n**Value** ✅`) : 5 ADRs (0020, 0021, 0022, 0024, 0025) Plus mixed metadata names (Authors / Deciders / Decision Date / Implementation Date / Implementation Status / Last Updated) and decorative emojis on status values made the corpus hard to scan or template against. **Canonical format adopted** (see `adr/README.md` for full template) : ```markdown # NN. Title **Status:** <Proposed | Accepted | Implemented | Partially Implemented | Approved | Rejected | Deferred | Deprecated | Superseded by ADR-NNNN> **Date:** YYYY-MM-DD **Authors:** Name(s) [optional **Field:** ... lines] ## Context... ``` **Transformations applied** (via `/tmp/homogenize-adrs.py` script, 23 files scanned, 21 modified — 0010 and 0012 were already conform) : - F1 list bullets → bold fields - F2 cleanup : `**Deciders:**` → `**Authors:**`, strip status emojis - F3 sections : `## Status\n**Value** ✅` → `**Status:** Value` (single line) - Strip decorative emojis from `**Status:**` and `**Implementation Status:**` - Convert `* Last Updated:` / `* Implementation Status:` / `* Decision Drivers:` / `* Decision Date:` to bold - Date typo fix : `2024-04-XX` → `2026-04-XX` for ADRs 0018, 0019 (off-by-2-years in original) - Normalize multiple blank lines after header (max 1) **ADR body content is preserved unchanged.** Only headers transformed. ### 2. Rewrite `adr/README.md` (commit `d64ab02`) Previous README had multiple inconsistencies : - Index table listed wrong titles for ADRs 0010-0021 (looked like an aspirational forecast that never matched reality — e.g. "0011 = Trunk-Based Development" but real 0011 is absent and Trunk-Based Development is actually 0017) - Listed entries for ADRs 0011 (validation library) and 0014 (gRPC) but **these files do not exist** in the repo - 0024 (BDD Test Organization) was missing from the detail list - Template still showed the obsolete F1 format (`* Status:`) - Decorative emojis on every status entry Rewrite : - Index table **regenerated from actual file contents** (title from H1, status from `**Status:**` line) — emoji-free, accurate - Notes that 0011 / 0014 are not currently in use (reserved) - Updated template block matches the canonical format - Status Legend extended with `Approved`, `Partially Implemented`, `Deferred` - Added note that 0026 is the next free number for new ADRs ## Test plan - [x] All 23 ADRs follow `**Status:**` / `**Date:**` / `**Authors:**` (verified via grep) - [x] No more occurrences of `* Status:` (F1) or `## Status` (F3) in any ADR header - [x] No more emojis on `**Status:**` lines - [x] `adr/README.md` index links resolve to existing files (no more 0011 / 0014 dead links) - [x] Pre-commit hooks pass (`go mod tidy`, `go fmt`, `swag fmt`) ## Migration context Part of Phase 1 of the ARCODANGE migration from Claude Code to Mistral Vibe. Tâche 7 of the curriculum. Independent from PR #17 (which restructures `AGENTS.md`). The two PRs touch disjoint files — no merge conflict expected when both are merged. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) (Opus 4.7, 1M context). Mistral Vibe (intent-router agent / mistral-medium-3.5) did the original audit identifying the 3 formats during Tâche 6 Phase A. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-Authored-By: Mistral Vibe (devstral-2 / mistral-medium-3.5) Reviewed-on: #18 Co-authored-by: Gabriel Radureau <arcodange@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Gabriel Radureau <arcodange@gmail.com>
317 lines
9.8 KiB
Markdown
317 lines
9.8 KiB
Markdown
# 17. Trunk-Based Development Workflow for CI/CD Safety
|
|
|
|
**Date:** 2026-04-05
|
|
**Status:** Approved
|
|
**Authors:** Arcodange Team
|
|
**Decision Date:** 2026-04-05
|
|
**Implementation Status:** Implemented
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
dance-lessons-coach requires a safe workflow for making CI/CD changes to prevent breaking the main branch. The current workflow allows direct pushes to main, which poses risks for CI/CD configuration changes that could break the entire pipeline.
|
|
|
|
## Decision Drivers
|
|
|
|
* **Safety**: Prevent CI/CD misconfigurations from breaking main branch
|
|
* **Review Process**: Ensure all CI/CD changes are properly reviewed
|
|
* **Trunk-Based**: Maintain trunk-based development principles
|
|
* **Branch Protection**: Protect main branch from direct CI/CD changes
|
|
* **Validation**: Automatically validate workflow changes before merge
|
|
* **Rollback**: Easy rollback capability for CI/CD issues
|
|
|
|
## Decision
|
|
|
|
We will implement a **Trunk-Based Development Workflow with Branch Protection** specifically designed for CI/CD safety.
|
|
|
|
### Selected Architecture: Protected Trunk with Validation Gates
|
|
|
|
```mermaid
|
|
graph TD
|
|
A[Developer] -->|Create Branch| B[ci/* or feature/*]
|
|
B -->|Push Changes| C[Git Server]
|
|
C -->|Trigger| D[CI/CD Pipeline]
|
|
D -->|Run| E[Workflow Validation Job]
|
|
E -->|Success| F[Pull Request]
|
|
F -->|Review| G[Team Review]
|
|
G -->|Approve| H[Merge to Main]
|
|
H -->|Trigger| I[Main Branch Pipeline]
|
|
I -->|Success| J[Production]
|
|
|
|
E -->|Failure| K[Fix Issues]
|
|
K -->|Loop| B
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Workflow Components
|
|
|
|
#### 1. Branch Strategy
|
|
|
|
| Branch Type | Pattern | Purpose | Protection |
|
|
|-------------|---------|---------|------------|
|
|
| **Main** | `main` | Production-ready code | 🔒 Fully Protected |
|
|
| **CI Updates** | `ci/*` | CI/CD configuration changes | 🛡️ Protected |
|
|
| **Features** | `feature/*` | New functionality | 🛡️ Protected |
|
|
| **Fixes** | `fix/*` | Bug fixes | 🛡️ Protected |
|
|
| **Refactor** | `refactor/*` | Code improvements | 🛡️ Protected |
|
|
|
|
#### 2. Branch Protection Rules
|
|
|
|
**Main Branch Protection:**
|
|
- ✅ Require pull request reviews (min 1 approval)
|
|
- ✅ Require status checks to pass
|
|
- ✅ Include administrators
|
|
- ✅ Dismiss stale pull request approvals when new commits are pushed
|
|
- ✅ Require conversation resolution before merging
|
|
|
|
**Required Status Checks:**
|
|
- `build-test` - All tests must pass
|
|
- `lint-format` - Code must be properly formatted
|
|
- `workflow-validation` - CI/CD changes must be validated
|
|
|
|
#### 3. CI/CD Workflow Triggers
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
on:
|
|
workflow_dispatch: true
|
|
push:
|
|
branches:
|
|
- main
|
|
- 'ci/**'
|
|
- 'feature/**'
|
|
- 'fix/**'
|
|
- 'refactor/**'
|
|
pull_request:
|
|
branches:
|
|
- main
|
|
types: [opened, synchronize, reopened, labeled]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### 4. Workflow Validation Job
|
|
|
|
A new `workflow-validation` job runs on:
|
|
- All pull requests targeting main
|
|
- Any push to `ci/*` branches
|
|
|
|
**Validation Steps:**
|
|
1. YAML syntax validation
|
|
2. Workflow structure validation
|
|
3. Breaking change detection
|
|
4. Required field verification
|
|
|
|
#### 5. Merge Process for CI/CD Changes
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# 1. Create dedicated CI branch
|
|
git checkout -b ci/update-workflow-v1
|
|
|
|
# 2. Make CI/CD changes
|
|
# (edit .gitea/workflows/ci-cd.yaml, scripts/cicd/, etc.)
|
|
|
|
# 3. Test locally first
|
|
./scripts/cicd.sh validate
|
|
./scripts/cicd.sh test-simple
|
|
|
|
# 4. Commit with clear message
|
|
git add .gitea/workflows/ci-cd.yaml scripts/cicd/
|
|
git commit -m "ci: update workflow with trunk protection"
|
|
|
|
# 5. Push and create PR
|
|
git push origin ci/update-workflow-v1
|
|
# Create Pull Request from ci/update-workflow-v1 to main
|
|
|
|
# 6. CI/CD pipeline automatically validates the workflow
|
|
# 7. Team reviews the changes
|
|
# 8. Merge after approval
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Implementation
|
|
|
|
#### Workflow File Updates
|
|
|
|
**`.gitea/workflows/ci-cd.yaml`:**
|
|
- Added `workflow-validation` job
|
|
- Extended branch triggers to include `ci/**`, `feature/**`, `fix/**`, `refactor/**`
|
|
- Added pull request triggers
|
|
- Made `version-check` job depend on `workflow-validation`
|
|
|
|
#### Script Updates
|
|
|
|
**`scripts/cicd/validate-workflow.sh`:**
|
|
- Enhanced to validate workflow changes in PR context
|
|
- Added breaking change detection
|
|
|
|
#### Branch Protection Setup
|
|
|
|
**Manual Gitea Configuration:**
|
|
1. Go to Repository Settings → Branches
|
|
2. Add branch protection rule for `main`
|
|
3. Enable required status checks
|
|
4. Add `workflow-validation` to required checks
|
|
|
|
### Consequences
|
|
|
|
**Positive:**
|
|
- ✅ Main branch protected from CI/CD misconfigurations
|
|
- ✅ All CI/CD changes go through validation and review
|
|
- ✅ Automatic detection of workflow breaking changes
|
|
- ✅ Clear rollback path (revert PR if issues arise)
|
|
- ✅ Maintains trunk-based development principles
|
|
- ✅ Encourages small, frequent CI/CD improvements
|
|
|
|
**Negative:**
|
|
- ❌ Slightly more complex process for CI/CD changes
|
|
- ❌ Requires discipline to use proper branch naming
|
|
- ❌ Initial setup of branch protection rules
|
|
|
|
### Future Enhancements
|
|
|
|
1. **Automatic Rollback**: Add automatic rollback for failed CI/CD changes
|
|
2. **Canary Deployments**: Test workflow changes on subset of runs first
|
|
3. **Workflow Diff Visualization**: Show workflow changes in PR comments
|
|
4. **Breaking Change Detection**: More sophisticated breaking change analysis
|
|
5. **Approver Assignment**: Auto-assign CI/CD experts for workflow PRs
|
|
|
|
### References
|
|
|
|
- [Trunk Based Development](https://trunkbaseddevelopment.com/)
|
|
- [GitHub Branch Protection](https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-protected-branches/about-protected-branches)
|
|
- [Gitea Branch Protection](https://docs.gitea.com/usage/repo-settings/branches/)
|
|
- [Atlassian Trunk-Based Development](https://www.atlassian.com/continuous-delivery/continuous-integration/trunk-based-development)
|
|
|
|
## Implementation Observations
|
|
|
|
### Gitea & GitHub Actions Compatibility Testing
|
|
|
|
**Test Date:** 2026-04-05
|
|
**Test Method:** `act` (GitHub Actions runner) with Gitea workflow syntax
|
|
**Result:** ✅ **FULL COMPATIBILITY CONFIRMED**
|
|
|
|
#### Test Command
|
|
```bash
|
|
echo 'm' | act -n -W .gitea/workflows/ci-cd.yaml
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Observations
|
|
|
|
1. **Syntax Compatibility:**
|
|
- ✅ Gitea workflow files work perfectly with GitHub Actions runner
|
|
- ✅ All GitHub Actions syntax supported in Gitea
|
|
- ✅ No syntax modifications needed
|
|
|
|
2. **Job Execution:**
|
|
- ✅ All jobs parsed correctly (build-test, lint-format, workflow-validation, version-check)
|
|
- ✅ Job dependencies resolved properly
|
|
- ✅ Conditional execution (`if:`) works as expected
|
|
|
|
3. **Action Compatibility:**
|
|
- ✅ `actions/checkout@v4` - ✅ Working
|
|
- ✅ `actions/setup-go@v4` - ✅ Working
|
|
- ✅ Standard GitHub actions work in Gitea context
|
|
|
|
4. **Local Testing Benefits:**
|
|
- ✅ **No Gitea instance required** for development
|
|
- ✅ **Instant feedback** on workflow changes
|
|
- ✅ **Dry run mode** prevents accidental executions
|
|
- ✅ **Container-based** ensures clean environment
|
|
|
|
5. **Performance:**
|
|
- ✅ Fast execution (dry run completed in <1 second)
|
|
- ✅ Minimal resource usage
|
|
- ✅ Docker layer caching works efficiently
|
|
|
|
#### Sample Dry Run Output
|
|
```
|
|
*DRYRUN* [dance-lessons-coach CI/CD/Build and Test ] ⭐ Run Set up job
|
|
*DRYRUN* [dance-lessons-coach CI/CD/Build and Test ] 🚀 Start image=node:16-buster-slim
|
|
*DRYRUN* [dance-lessons-coach CI/CD/Build and Test ] ✅ Success - Set up job
|
|
*DRYRUN* [dance-lessons-coach CI/CD/Build and Test ] ⭐ Run Main Checkout code
|
|
*DRYRUN* [dance-lessons-coach CI/CD/Build and Test ] ✅ Success - Main Checkout code [4.038875ms]
|
|
... (all steps succeeded)
|
|
*DRYRUN* [dance-lessons-coach CI/CD/Build and Test ] 🏁 Job succeeded
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Recommended Local Development Workflow
|
|
|
|
#### 1. Install `act`
|
|
```bash
|
|
# macOS (Homebrew)
|
|
brew install act
|
|
|
|
# Linux
|
|
curl https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nektos/act/master/install.sh | sudo bash
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### 2. Configure `act`
|
|
```bash
|
|
mkdir -p ~/Library/Application\ Support/act
|
|
cat > ~/Library/Application\ Support/act/actrc << 'EOF'
|
|
{
|
|
"defaultImage": "medium:latest",
|
|
"containerArchitecture": "linux/amd64"
|
|
}
|
|
EOF
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### 3. Test Workflow Changes
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Dry run (no execution)
|
|
act -n -W .gitea/workflows/ci-cd.yaml
|
|
|
|
# Full test execution
|
|
act -W .gitea/workflows/ci-cd.yaml
|
|
|
|
# Test specific job
|
|
act -j build-test -W .gitea/workflows/ci-cd.yaml
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### 4. Development Cycle
|
|
```bash
|
|
# 1. Create feature branch
|
|
git checkout -b ci/new-feature
|
|
|
|
# 2. Make workflow changes
|
|
# (edit .gitea/workflows/ci-cd.yaml)
|
|
|
|
# 3. Test locally
|
|
act -n -W .gitea/workflows/ci-cd.yaml
|
|
|
|
# 4. Commit and push
|
|
git add .gitea/workflows/ci-cd.yaml
|
|
git commit -m "ci: add new feature to workflow"
|
|
git push origin ci/new-feature
|
|
|
|
# 5. Create PR and let CI validate
|
|
# 6. Merge after approval
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Benefits of This Approach
|
|
|
|
✅ **No Remote Dependencies** - Test without Gitea instance
|
|
✅ **Instant Feedback** - Catch issues before pushing
|
|
✅ **Reduced PR Churn** - Fewer workflow patch iterations
|
|
✅ **Better Developer Experience** - Local testing = faster iteration
|
|
✅ **Production Confidence** - What works locally works in Gitea
|
|
✅ **Team Efficiency** - No more "wait and see" with remote CI
|
|
|
|
### Future Enhancements
|
|
|
|
1. **CI/CD Test Script** - Add `act` testing to our CI/CD scripts
|
|
2. **Pre-commit Hook** - Automatically validate workflows before commit
|
|
3. **GitHub Actions Cache** - Speed up local testing with caching
|
|
4. **Matrix Testing** - Test across multiple runner versions
|
|
5. **Workflow Visualization** - Generate diagrams from workflow files
|
|
|
|
## Decision Record
|
|
|
|
**Approved by:** Arcodange Team
|
|
**Approved on:** 2026-04-05
|
|
**Implementation Owner:** CI/CD Team
|
|
**Reviewers:** Development Team
|
|
**Tested by:** Local `act` dry run
|
|
**Compatibility:** ✅ GitHub Actions ↔ Gitea Actions
|
|
|
|
**Change Log:**
|
|
- 2026-04-05: Initial decision and implementation
|
|
- 2026-04-05: Added workflow validation job
|
|
- 2026-04-05: Updated branch protection rules
|
|
- 2026-04-05: Confirmed Gitea/GitHub compatibility via `act` testing
|
|
- 2026-04-05: Documented local development workflow |