Files
dance-lessons-coach/adr/0007-opentelemetry-integration.md
Gabriel Radureau a24b4fdb3b 📝 docs(adr): homogenize 23 ADRs + rewrite README (Tâche 7 migration) (#18)
## Summary

Homogenize all 23 ADRs to a single canonical header format, and rewrite `adr/README.md` to match the actual state of the corpus.

This is **Tâche 7** of the ARCODANGE Phase 1 migration (Claude Code → Mistral Vibe). Independent from PR #17 (Tâche 6 — restructure AGENTS.md) — both can merge in any order. No code changes; only documentation.

## Changes

### 1. Homogenize 21 ADR headers (commit `db09d0a`)

The audit (Tâche 6 Phase A, Mistral intent-router agent, 2026-05-02) had identified **3 inconsistent header formats** :

- **F1** — list bullets (`* Status:` / `* Date:` / `* Deciders:`) : 11 ADRs (0001-0008, 0011, 0014, 0023)
- **F2** — bold fields (`**Status:**` / `**Date:**` / `**Authors:**`) : 9 ADRs (0009, 0010, 0012, 0013, 0015, 0016, 0017, 0018, 0019)
- **F3** — dedicated section (`## Status\n**Value** `) : 5 ADRs (0020, 0021, 0022, 0024, 0025)

Plus mixed metadata names (Authors / Deciders / Decision Date / Implementation Date / Implementation Status / Last Updated) and decorative emojis on status values made the corpus hard to scan or template against.

**Canonical format adopted** (see `adr/README.md` for full template) :

```markdown
# NN. Title

**Status:** <Proposed | Accepted | Implemented | Partially Implemented | Approved | Rejected | Deferred | Deprecated | Superseded by ADR-NNNN>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Authors:** Name(s)

[optional **Field:** ... lines]

## Context...
```

**Transformations applied** (via `/tmp/homogenize-adrs.py` script, 23 files scanned, 21 modified — 0010 and 0012 were already conform) :

- F1 list bullets → bold fields
- F2 cleanup : `**Deciders:**` → `**Authors:**`, strip status emojis
- F3 sections : `## Status\n**Value** ` → `**Status:** Value` (single line)
- Strip decorative emojis from `**Status:**` and `**Implementation Status:**`
- Convert `* Last Updated:` / `* Implementation Status:` / `* Decision Drivers:` / `* Decision Date:` to bold
- Date typo fix : `2024-04-XX` → `2026-04-XX` for ADRs 0018, 0019 (off-by-2-years in original)
- Normalize multiple blank lines after header (max 1)

**ADR body content is preserved unchanged.** Only headers transformed.

### 2. Rewrite `adr/README.md` (commit `d64ab02`)

Previous README had multiple inconsistencies :

- Index table listed wrong titles for ADRs 0010-0021 (looked like an aspirational forecast that never matched reality — e.g. "0011 = Trunk-Based Development" but real 0011 is absent and Trunk-Based Development is actually 0017)
- Listed entries for ADRs 0011 (validation library) and 0014 (gRPC) but **these files do not exist** in the repo
- 0024 (BDD Test Organization) was missing from the detail list
- Template still showed the obsolete F1 format (`* Status:`)
- Decorative emojis on every status entry

Rewrite :

- Index table **regenerated from actual file contents** (title from H1, status from `**Status:**` line) — emoji-free, accurate
- Notes that 0011 / 0014 are not currently in use (reserved)
- Updated template block matches the canonical format
- Status Legend extended with `Approved`, `Partially Implemented`, `Deferred`
- Added note that 0026 is the next free number for new ADRs

## Test plan

- [x] All 23 ADRs follow `**Status:**` / `**Date:**` / `**Authors:**` (verified via grep)
- [x] No more occurrences of `* Status:` (F1) or `## Status` (F3) in any ADR header
- [x] No more emojis on `**Status:**` lines
- [x] `adr/README.md` index links resolve to existing files (no more 0011 / 0014 dead links)
- [x] Pre-commit hooks pass (`go mod tidy`, `go fmt`, `swag fmt`)

## Migration context

Part of Phase 1 of the ARCODANGE migration from Claude Code to Mistral Vibe. Tâche 7 of the curriculum.

Independent from PR #17 (which restructures `AGENTS.md`). The two PRs touch disjoint files — no merge conflict expected when both are merged.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) (Opus 4.7, 1M context). Mistral Vibe (intent-router agent / mistral-medium-3.5) did the original audit identifying the 3 formats during Tâche 6 Phase A.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Mistral Vibe (devstral-2 / mistral-medium-3.5)
Reviewed-on: #18
Co-authored-by: Gabriel Radureau <arcodange@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: Gabriel Radureau <arcodange@gmail.com>
2026-05-03 11:01:13 +02:00

152 lines
4.4 KiB
Markdown

# Integrate OpenTelemetry for distributed tracing
**Status:** Accepted
**Authors:** Gabriel Radureau, AI Agent
**Date:** 2026-04-04
## Context and Problem Statement
We needed to add observability to dance-lessons-coach that provides:
- Distributed tracing capabilities
- Performance monitoring
- Request flow visualization
- Integration with existing monitoring systems
- Minimal impact on application performance
## Decision Drivers
* Need for distributed tracing in microservices architecture
* Desire for performance monitoring
* Requirement for request flow visualization
* Need for integration with monitoring tools
* Desire for minimal performance impact
## Considered Options
* OpenTelemetry - CNCF standard for observability
* Jaeger client - Direct Jaeger integration
* Zipkin - Alternative tracing system
* Custom solution - Build our own tracing
## Decision Outcome
Chosen option: "OpenTelemetry" because it provides industry-standard observability, good performance, flexibility for multiple backends, and is becoming the standard for distributed tracing.
## Pros and Cons of the Options
### OpenTelemetry
* Good, because CNCF standard with broad industry adoption
* Good, because supports multiple tracing backends (Jaeger, Zipkin, etc.)
* Good, because good performance characteristics
* Good, because active development and community
* Good, because vendor-neutral
* Bad, because more complex setup
* Bad, because larger dependency footprint
### Jaeger client
* Good, because direct integration with Jaeger
* Good, because simpler setup
* Bad, because vendor-locked to Jaeger
* Bad, because less flexible for future changes
### Zipkin
* Good, because established tracing system
* Good, because good ecosystem
* Bad, because less feature-rich than OpenTelemetry
* Bad, because declining popularity
### Custom solution
* Good, because tailored to our needs
* Good, because no external dependencies
* Bad, because time-consuming to develop
* Bad, because need to maintain ourselves
* Bad, because likely less feature-rich
## Implementation Approach
### Middleware-only approach
We chose a middleware-only approach using `otelhttp.NewHandler` rather than manual instrumentation:
```go
// In pkg/server/server.go
func (s *Server) getAllMiddlewares() []func(http.Handler) http.Handler {
middlewares := []func(http.Handler) http.Handler{
middleware.StripSlashes,
middleware.Recoverer,
}
if s.withOTEL {
middlewares = append(middlewares, func(next http.Handler) http.Handler {
return otelhttp.NewHandler(next, "")
})
}
return middlewares
}
```
### Benefits of middleware approach
* **Clean separation**: Tracing logic separate from business logic
* **Consistent instrumentation**: All endpoints automatically traced
* **Easy to enable/disable**: Single configuration flag
* **Maintainable**: No tracing boilerplate in service code
* **Upgradable**: Easy to change tracing implementation
## Configuration
```yaml
# config.yaml
telemetry:
enabled: true
otlp_endpoint: "localhost:4317"
service_name: "dance-lessons-coach"
insecure: true
sampler:
type: "parentbased_always_on"
ratio: 1.0
```
## Jaeger Integration
```bash
# Start Jaeger with OTLP support
docker run -d --name jaeger \
-e COLLECTOR_OTLP_ENABLED=true \
-p 16686:16686 \
-p 4317:4317 \
jaegertracing/all-in-one:latest
# Start server with OpenTelemetry
DLC_TELEMETRY_ENABLED=true ./scripts/start-server.sh start
# View traces at http://localhost:16686
```
## Links
* [OpenTelemetry GitHub](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go)
* [OpenTelemetry Documentation](https://opentelemetry.io/docs/instrumentation/go/)
* [Jaeger Documentation](https://www.jaegertracing.io/docs/)
* [OTLP Specification](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/specification/protocol/otlp.md)
## Sampler Types Supported
* `always_on` - Sample all traces
* `always_off` - Sample no traces
* `traceidratio` - Sample based on trace ID ratio
* `parentbased_always_on` - Sample based on parent span (always on)
* `parentbased_always_off` - Sample based on parent span (always off)
* `parentbased_traceidratio` - Sample based on parent span with ratio
## Performance Considerations
* OpenTelemetry adds minimal overhead when disabled
* Sampling can be used to reduce overhead in production
* Tracing data is sent asynchronously to minimize impact
* Context propagation is efficient using Go's context package