fleet/profile/ goes from stub to the machine-readable business-rules surface the fleet reads (PRD agent-catalog document surface + compliance ADC framework): - fiscal.yaml — entity, VAT position, 8 rules (regime reel simplifie until 2026-12-31 -> quarterly CA3 from 2027-01-01 per LF 2025 art. 38; KM export autoliquidation 259-1 CGI box E2; FR 20% deductible; intra-EU reverse charge; FX 766/666; SaaS expensed; CCA 455 lane). Every rule carries effective_from/effective_until AND decision: adc-NNN; every date cites its PRD anchor as an inline comment (verified against factory origin/main). - calendar.yaml — 15 entries: acomptes TVA (2026-07 month-window, 2026-12-15), last CA12 FY-2026 (2027-05-04), CA3 quarterly windows, CFE (December), AG comptes annuels (2027-06-30), e-invoicing milestones (2026-09-01 reception, 2027-09-01 emission/e-reporting), URSSAF echeancier with the in-file NOTE that a real direct debit exists since May 2026 (erp#57 revisit of the payroll-dormant assumption), KM deferred due dates + renewal stub. - JSON Schemas for both + scripts/validate.py (stdlib-only: strict YAML-subset parser, JSON-Schema-subset checker, rule->ADC resolution, calendar checks). - decisions/ — ADC register: template + adc-001..005 Accepted formalizations (autoliquidation KM, FX->766/666, SaaS expensed, reel simplifie until abolition, CCA personal-card lane) + adc-006/007 Proposed stubs (retainer currency -> erp#53; capital path -> erp#51). Agents draft, the operator Accepts — never the reverse; immutable once merged, supersede never edit. - Mutation policy in-file: PRs only (T12 proposes, human merges). - Same-change: profile README stub -> real doc; fleet/README.md layout line and AGENTS.md fleet row updated (profile no longer a stub). Validation: PASS — 8 rules, 15 entries, 7 ADCs, 0 errors, 7 warnings (the warnings list exactly what awaits operator verification). Human gate left open on purpose: operator sanity-read of the calendar + Acceptance of adc-001..005. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VRShc4QhLLU73FLHx9vskh
67 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
67 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
id: adc-006
|
||
title: "KM retainer currency & composition (USD multicurrency vs EUR-at-settlement; line structure)"
|
||
status: Proposed
|
||
decided: null
|
||
effective_from: null
|
||
effective_until: null
|
||
supersedes: null
|
||
superseded_by: null
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# adc-006 — KM retainer currency & composition (Proposed)
|
||
|
||
> **Proposed — operator input needed.** This stub reserves the decision slot
|
||
> per the PRD [compliance › ADC seed table](https://gitea.arcodange.lab/arcodange-org/factory/src/branch/main/vibe/PRD/ai-back-office/compliance.md#accounting-decision-records-adc)
|
||
> ("blocks erp#53 wiring; operator input needed"). Agents may enrich the
|
||
> draft with sources and alternatives; **only the operator Accepts**.
|
||
|
||
## Context
|
||
|
||
The recurring template id=1 carries 5100 while the actual May/June drafts were
|
||
2×2145.92 + 2×2575.11 EUR; the 2026-07-11 regularization surfaced a probable
|
||
**USD-denominated retainer** ($5,500/mo = $2,500 net-30 + $3,000 deferred
|
||
+3 months — erp#53; contract WIP `test/km_contract.json` in the trunk). FX
|
||
deltas have already been booked twice under adc-002. The invoicing method must
|
||
be stable before T05 automation wires it (permanence des méthodes — not
|
||
improvised per month).
|
||
|
||
## Decision
|
||
|
||
**To arbitrate — no decision recorded.** Open questions (erp#53):
|
||
|
||
1. USD multicurrency invoices vs EUR-at-settlement invoicing?
|
||
2. One invoice with two lines vs two invoices per month (net-30 part /
|
||
deferred part)?
|
||
3. Écarts de change policy interaction with adc-002 (would a USD-multicurrency
|
||
choice narrow or supersede it for future invoices)?
|
||
|
||
## Base légale & doctrine
|
||
|
||
To gather with the full draft: CGI art. 289 (invoice currency rules), PCG FX
|
||
treatment for multicurrency receivables, Dolibarr multicurrency module
|
||
implications. Nothing asserted here yet.
|
||
|
||
## Alternatives rejected
|
||
|
||
None yet — the alternatives above are open; each needs its why-it-loses
|
||
written before acceptance.
|
||
|
||
## Consequences
|
||
|
||
- **Blocks erp#53** (T05 monthly client invoice at A2): wiring waits for this
|
||
record to be Accepted.
|
||
- May supersede or narrow adc-002's scope for future invoices.
|
||
- Annexe: revenue-recognition/currency method disclosure once Accepted.
|
||
|
||
## QA & validation
|
||
|
||
Planned per erp#53: dry-run parity (first agent-fired invoice == its manual
|
||
twin), then one real month through the gate — after acceptance.
|
||
|
||
## References
|
||
|
||
- erp#53 (T05 client invoice; decision D3) · erp#54 (register seeding).
|
||
- PRD compliance.md § ADC seed table (adc-006).
|
||
- adc-002 (current FX method) · trunk WIP `test/km_contract.json`.
|