Files
erp/fleet/profile/decisions/adc-006-km-retainer-currency.md
arcodangeandClaude Fable 5 a482bb18c4 feat(fleet): fiscal profile + compliance calendar + ADC register (erp#54, T11 data)
fleet/profile/ goes from stub to the machine-readable business-rules surface
the fleet reads (PRD agent-catalog document surface + compliance ADC framework):

- fiscal.yaml — entity, VAT position, 8 rules (regime reel simplifie until
  2026-12-31 -> quarterly CA3 from 2027-01-01 per LF 2025 art. 38; KM export
  autoliquidation 259-1 CGI box E2; FR 20% deductible; intra-EU reverse
  charge; FX 766/666; SaaS expensed; CCA 455 lane). Every rule carries
  effective_from/effective_until AND decision: adc-NNN; every date cites its
  PRD anchor as an inline comment (verified against factory origin/main).
- calendar.yaml — 15 entries: acomptes TVA (2026-07 month-window, 2026-12-15),
  last CA12 FY-2026 (2027-05-04), CA3 quarterly windows, CFE (December),
  AG comptes annuels (2027-06-30), e-invoicing milestones (2026-09-01
  reception, 2027-09-01 emission/e-reporting), URSSAF echeancier with the
  in-file NOTE that a real direct debit exists since May 2026 (erp#57 revisit
  of the payroll-dormant assumption), KM deferred due dates + renewal stub.
- JSON Schemas for both + scripts/validate.py (stdlib-only: strict YAML-subset
  parser, JSON-Schema-subset checker, rule->ADC resolution, calendar checks).
- decisions/ — ADC register: template + adc-001..005 Accepted formalizations
  (autoliquidation KM, FX->766/666, SaaS expensed, reel simplifie until
  abolition, CCA personal-card lane) + adc-006/007 Proposed stubs (retainer
  currency -> erp#53; capital path -> erp#51). Agents draft, the operator
  Accepts — never the reverse; immutable once merged, supersede never edit.
- Mutation policy in-file: PRs only (T12 proposes, human merges).
- Same-change: profile README stub -> real doc; fleet/README.md layout line
  and AGENTS.md fleet row updated (profile no longer a stub).

Validation: PASS — 8 rules, 15 entries, 7 ADCs, 0 errors, 7 warnings (the
warnings list exactly what awaits operator verification). Human gate left
open on purpose: operator sanity-read of the calendar + Acceptance of
adc-001..005.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VRShc4QhLLU73FLHx9vskh
2026-07-18 23:45:00 +02:00

67 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
id: adc-006
title: "KM retainer currency & composition (USD multicurrency vs EUR-at-settlement; line structure)"
status: Proposed
decided: null
effective_from: null
effective_until: null
supersedes: null
superseded_by: null
---
# adc-006 — KM retainer currency & composition (Proposed)
> **Proposed — operator input needed.** This stub reserves the decision slot
> per the PRD [compliance ADC seed table](https://gitea.arcodange.lab/arcodange-org/factory/src/branch/main/vibe/PRD/ai-back-office/compliance.md#accounting-decision-records-adc)
> ("blocks erp#53 wiring; operator input needed"). Agents may enrich the
> draft with sources and alternatives; **only the operator Accepts**.
## Context
The recurring template id=1 carries 5100 while the actual May/June drafts were
2×2145.92 + 2×2575.11 EUR; the 2026-07-11 regularization surfaced a probable
**USD-denominated retainer** ($5,500/mo = $2,500 net-30 + $3,000 deferred
+3 months — erp#53; contract WIP `test/km_contract.json` in the trunk). FX
deltas have already been booked twice under adc-002. The invoicing method must
be stable before T05 automation wires it (permanence des méthodes — not
improvised per month).
## Decision
**To arbitrate — no decision recorded.** Open questions (erp#53):
1. USD multicurrency invoices vs EUR-at-settlement invoicing?
2. One invoice with two lines vs two invoices per month (net-30 part /
deferred part)?
3. Écarts de change policy interaction with adc-002 (would a USD-multicurrency
choice narrow or supersede it for future invoices)?
## Base légale & doctrine
To gather with the full draft: CGI art. 289 (invoice currency rules), PCG FX
treatment for multicurrency receivables, Dolibarr multicurrency module
implications. Nothing asserted here yet.
## Alternatives rejected
None yet — the alternatives above are open; each needs its why-it-loses
written before acceptance.
## Consequences
- **Blocks erp#53** (T05 monthly client invoice at A2): wiring waits for this
record to be Accepted.
- May supersede or narrow adc-002's scope for future invoices.
- Annexe: revenue-recognition/currency method disclosure once Accepted.
## QA & validation
Planned per erp#53: dry-run parity (first agent-fired invoice == its manual
twin), then one real month through the gate — after acceptance.
## References
- erp#53 (T05 client invoice; decision D3) · erp#54 (register seeding).
- PRD compliance.md § ADC seed table (adc-006).
- adc-002 (current FX method) · trunk WIP `test/km_contract.json`.