Files
dance-lessons-coach/adr/0006-configuration-management.md
Gabriel Radureau 95596b5e12 📝 docs: consolidate documentation and add comprehensive ADRs\n\n## Summary\nMajor documentation restructuring to improve clarity, reduce redundancy,
and preserve complete architectural context for AI/developer reference.\n\n## Changes\n\n### Documentation Consolidation 🗂️\n- Simplified README.md by ~100 lines (25% reduction)\n- Removed redundant sections (project structure, configuration, API docs)\n- Added strategic cross-references between README.md and AGENTS.md\n- README.md now focused on user onboarding and basic usage\n- AGENTS.md maintained as complete technical reference\n\n### Architecture Decision Records \n- Added comprehensive ADR directory with 9 decision records:\n  * 0001-go-1.26.1-standard.md\n  * 0002-chi-router.md\n  * 0003-zerolog-logging.md (enhanced with Zap analysis)\n  * 0004-interface-based-design.md\n  * 0005-graceful-shutdown.md\n  * 0006-configuration-management.md\n  * 0007-opentelemetry-integration.md\n  * 0008-bdd-testing.md\n  * 0009-hybrid-testing-approach.md\n- Added adr/README.md with guidelines and template\n- Enhanced Zerolog ADR with detailed performance benchmarking vs Zap\n\n### Content Organization 📝\n- README.md: User-focused guide with quick start and basic examples\n- AGENTS.md: Developer/AI-focused complete technical reference\n- ADR directory: Architectural decision history and rationale\n\n## Impact\n-  Better user onboarding experience\n-  Preserved complete technical context for AI agents\n-  Reduced maintenance burden through consolidation\n-  Improved discoverability of advanced documentation\n-  Established ADR process for future decisions\n\n## Related\n- Resolves documentation redundancy issues\n- Prepares for BDD implementation with clear context\n- Supports future Swagger integration decisions\n- Maintains project history for new contributors\n\nGenerated by Mistral Vibe.\nCo-Authored-By: Mistral Vibe <vibe@mistral.ai>
2026-04-04 15:48:27 +02:00

3.8 KiB

Use Viper for configuration management

  • Status: Accepted
  • Deciders: Gabriel Radureau, AI Agent
  • Date: 2026-04-03

Context and Problem Statement

We needed a configuration management solution for DanceLessonsCoach that provides:

  • Support for multiple configuration sources (files, environment variables, defaults)
  • Configuration validation
  • Type-safe configuration loading
  • Hot reloading capabilities
  • Good error handling and reporting

Decision Drivers

  • Need for flexible configuration from multiple sources
  • Desire for configuration validation
  • Requirement for type-safe access to configuration
  • Need for environment-specific configurations
  • Desire for good error messages

Considered Options

  • Viper - Popular configuration library with many features
  • Koanf - Lightweight but powerful
  • envconfig - Simple environment variable loading
  • Custom solution - Build our own configuration loader

Decision Outcome

Chosen option: "Viper" because it provides comprehensive configuration management with support for multiple sources, good validation capabilities, type-safe loading, and is widely used in the Go ecosystem.

Pros and Cons of the Options

Viper

  • Good, because supports multiple configuration sources
  • Good, because good validation capabilities
  • Good, because type-safe configuration loading
  • Good, because widely used and well-documented
  • Good, because supports hot reloading
  • Bad, because slightly heavier than alternatives
  • Bad, because more complex API

Koanf

  • Good, because lightweight
  • Good, because good performance
  • Good, because simple API
  • Bad, because less feature-rich than Viper
  • Bad, because smaller community

envconfig

  • Good, because very simple
  • Good, because good for environment variables
  • Bad, because limited to environment variables
  • Bad, because no file support

Custom solution

  • Good, because tailored to our needs
  • Good, because no external dependencies
  • Bad, because time-consuming to develop
  • Bad, because need to maintain ourselves
  • Bad, because likely less feature-rich

Implementation Example

// Configuration structure
type Config struct {
    Server    ServerConfig    `mapstructure:"server"`
    Shutdown  ShutdownConfig  `mapstructure:"shutdown"`
    Logging   LoggingConfig   `mapstructure:"logging"`
}

// Loading configuration
func LoadConfig() (*Config, error) {
    v := viper.New()
    
    // Set defaults
    v.SetDefault("server.host", "0.0.0.0")
    v.SetDefault("server.port", 8080)
    
    // Read config file
    v.SetConfigName("config")
    v.SetConfigType("yaml")
    v.AddConfigPath(".")
    
    if err := v.ReadInConfig(); err != nil {
        if _, ok := err.(viper.ConfigFileNotFoundError); !ok {
            return nil, err
       }
    }
    
    // Bind environment variables
    v.AutomaticEnv()
    v.SetEnvPrefix("DLC")
    
    // Unmarshal into struct
    var config Config
    if err := v.Unmarshal(&config); err != nil {
        return nil, err
    }
    
    return &config, nil
}

Configuration Priority

The implementation follows this priority order:

  1. Config file (highest priority)
  2. Environment variables (override defaults)
  3. Default values (lowest priority)

Configuration File Example

# config.yaml
server:
  host: "0.0.0.0"
  port: 8080

shutdown:
  timeout: 30s

logging:
  json: false
  level: "trace"

Environment Variables

# Set configuration via environment variables
export DLC_SERVER_HOST="0.0.0.0"
export DLC_SERVER_PORT=8080
export DLC_SHUTDOWN_TIMEOUT=30s
export DLC_LOGGING_JSON=false