arcodangeandClaude Fable 5
ceb4321224
- runs/2026-07-18/: the 8 sha256-pinned verifier transcripts (4 runtimes × 2 tests), blind-judging verdicts (2 independent judges per cell, unanimous), the erp#56 builder-bench journal + prompt + caps, and the evidence README with the parity table. - run-verifier.sh: mistral runtime drops the tool-filter flag (--enabled-tools with a no-match pattern hangs vibe 2.21.0); plain -p with --max-turns 1. Verdicts: Mistral (vibe -p, mistral-medium-3.5) and Ornith 35B (hermes MLX) reach verdict parity with the Claude baseline on both tests → admitted to verifier duty. Qwen2.5-7B-4bit fails both → the honest small-model floor. Builder bench: erp#56 completed by the Mistral runtime, 0 code corrections, 261 s, acceptance run clean (0 bank-UNKNOWN) → merged as PR #68. Closes #63 (with the paired factory qa-strategy PR). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VRShc4QhLLU73FLHx9vskh
21 lines
4.0 KiB
JSON
21 lines
4.0 KiB
JSON
{
|
||
"test": "backlog",
|
||
"runtime": "ornith",
|
||
"model": "leonsarmiento/Ornith-1.0-35B-5bit-mlx",
|
||
"endpoint": "http://127.0.0.1:18080/v1",
|
||
"timestamp": "20260718T185050",
|
||
"latency_s": 51,
|
||
"prompt_sha256": "28b6bbaabb441f4b4c9d7bf7eb1236f14a1689716ee8c615506654a5ca1f8020",
|
||
"inputs": {
|
||
"AGENTS.md": {
|
||
"path": "/Users/gabrielradureau/Work/Arcodange/erp/.claude/worktrees/harness-portability/AGENTS.md",
|
||
"sha256": "a77d356e7804d2792b605bef2e9daba0233d93ef791675acda021d2dac9b02a6"
|
||
},
|
||
"STATUS.md": {
|
||
"path": "/private/tmp/claude-502/-Users-gabrielradureau-Work-Arcodange-erp/3f5e7a57-37fd-4fed-b967-3efdc6435a91/scratchpad/inputs/STATUS.md",
|
||
"sha256": "8a6fcbbd50fc60f3a557260662a478db98622a146c2a4fe03264fe1c76e7da9b"
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
"response": "\n\nBased strictly on the two provided documents:\n\n### 1. What shipped most recently?\n**`erp#38` (fleet scaffold)** shipped on **2026-07-15** via PR `erp#62`. It settled D8 and is the only milestone row marked `✅` in the phase tracker. The status header explicitly calls it out: *\"execution started — erp#38 shipped, D8 settled (2026-07-15)\"*.\n\n### 2. What should be worked on next, and why?\n**`erp#39` (golden set + injection fixtures)** is the designated next item.\n\n**Why:**\n- **Milestone ordering:** The resume protocol mandates picking the top unblocked issue of the *earliest open milestone*. P1 (due 2026-10-09) is the earliest open, and #38 is the only completed P1 issue.\n- **Explicit cold-start label:** The backlog map states: *\"Cold-start entry points as of 2026-07-15 (post-#38): **erp#39** (golden set — the eval half of the harness, now unblocked)\"*.\n- **Unblocked & independent:** It has no open `[HUMAN]` gates blocking it, and the arbitration rule explicitly allows it to run in parallel with `#51` and `#41–44` because they *\"touch disjoint directories\"*. However, #39 is the canonical P1 successor and the eval harness it builds is a prerequisite for the autonomy ladder and graduation protocol described in `AGENTS.md`.\n\n*(Note: Per the arbitration rule, a session could legitimately fan out `#39 ∥ #51 ∥ #41–44` in parallel, but #39 is the primary next pick.)*\n\n### 3. What would you verify before trusting these documents, and in what order?\nThe documents explicitly define a **trust order** for versionable claims. I would audit in that exact sequence, mapping each tier to concrete verification actions:\n\n| Trust Tier | What to verify | How (per doc context) |\n|------------|----------------|------------------------|\n| **1. Live system** | Actual state of the ERP, sandbox, CLI, and issue #38's deliverables | Hit `erp.arcodange.lab` and `erp-sandbox.arcodange.lab`; run `bin/arcodange` read commands; confirm the fleet scaffold actually exists and functions; verify `ai_agent`/`ai_agent_sandbox` keys behave as described (read-only prod, host-guarded sandbox). |\n| **2. Code / Git log** | Merge state, branch reality, directory layout, milestone closure | Check Gitea for PR `erp#62` (merged? closed?). Inspect `fleet/`, `fleet/classes/`, `atom.yaml` registry, and the P1 milestone state. Confirm `erp#38` is actually closed and its deliverables match the issue body. |\n| **3. STATUS.md** | Internal consistency, date accuracy, backlog map fidelity | Verify `Last Updated: 2026-07-15` matches the newest closed milestone. Cross-check the phase tracker row for P1 against Gitea. Confirm the backlog map's open/closed flags match actual issue states. |\n| **4. PRD leaves** | Cross-document consistency | Read the linked PRD files (`compliance.md`, `agent-architecture.md`, `agent-catalog.md`, `qa-strategy.md`, `roadmap.md`, `poc-plan.md`). Check for stale claims, broken anchors, or contradictions with STATUS (e.g., `not yet` claims that should now be `✅`). |\n| **5. Memories / plans** | Lowest priority | Treat any session memory or plan as untrusted until tiers 1–4 confirm it. |\n\n**Additional doc-surface checks** (from the closure protocol, §6):\n- Run a **fresh-reader smoke test**: a context-free reader of only `STATUS.md` + repo `AGENTS.md` must"
|
||
}
|