La convention annexée aux statuts (annexe 3) et la décision n°1 de l'associé
unique du 09/01/2026 fixent une indemnité d'occupation de 220 EUR/mois pour un
bureau de 10 m² dans le domicile du gérant. Elle n'a JAMAIS été ni versée ni
comptabilisée : aucun tiers, aucune des 15 factures fournisseur, aucune ligne au
grand livre bancaire.
Change-set : un tiers « Radureau Gabriel » (FO0012) puis 7 factures fournisseur
validées et réglées par inscription au compte courant d'associé (compte 3), sans
mouvement de trésorerie — la voie adc-005. Janvier au PRORATA : la convention
prend effet à sa signature, 23 jours sur 31 → 163,23 EUR. Total 1 483,23 EUR et
non 1 540 : un mois plein aurait été légèrement généreux.
Chaque facture porte en note le fondement complet et le calcul qui justifie le
forfait — loyer 1 100 EUR, quote-part de surface 16,67 % → 183,33, charges
réelles 12,53 au prorata, soit 195,87 de prorata strict contre 220 retenus
(+12,3 %). La justification vit ainsi avec l'écriture, pas dans une note à part.
Répétition sandbox : 8 opérations, 14 suites, toutes ok. Dates vérifiées en
Europe/Paris — lues en UTC elles semblent reculées d'un jour, Dolibarr tronquant
à minuit heure serveur. Compte courant : -429,75 → -1 912,98.
Corrige un vrai défaut du pipeline découvert en route : quand une op échoue,
{id} était remplacé par le DICTIONNAIRE D'ERREUR, l'URL devenait un JSON
multiligne, urllib levait InvalidURL et l'étape mourait AVANT d'écrire son
artefact — on perdait la preuve de l'échec qu'on venait de produire. Corrigé
dans rehearse et dans apply, où --keep-going exposait la même faille en pleine
écriture de production.
Verdict pré-gate : BLOCK (mistral), au motif d'une numérotation non chronologique
contraire au CGI art. 289. FAUX POSITIF, démontré sur la production : les
factures FOURNISSEUR portent déjà 5 ruptures de chronologie, leur séquence
suivant l'ordre d'enregistrement et non la date du document ; les factures
ÉMISES, seules visées par l'art. 289, en comptent 0. Le juge a appliqué au
registre des factures reçues une règle qui ne gouverne que celles émises. Sa
recommandation de renumérotation casserait la piste d'audit fiable.
Le gate humain n'est pas franchi : rien n'est écrit en production.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
fleet/ — the atom registry
The fleet is Arcodange's AI back-office: narrow agents ("atoms") that operate the Dolibarr ERP's daily admin & accounting under the AI back-office PRD. This directory is the registry — the versioned source of truth for what the fleet may do. An atom absent from the registry does not run. Contract semantics come from the PRD atom contract; file syntax from the PRD document surface.
What an atom is
One narrow capability (classify, extract, validate, record, reconcile, report, remind) with a strict I/O contract and deterministic validators around it. The LLM proposes, code disposes: formats, arithmetic, checksums, dedupe and referential integrity are enforced by validators, and a model output that fails validation is quarantined, never auto-corrected. Workflows are compositions of atoms with explicit gates — never one prompt that "does the accounting".
Each atom lives in fleet/atoms/<atom>/:
| File | Role |
|---|---|
atom.yaml |
the registry entry — the contract (schema below) |
prompt.md |
thin runtime prompt, ≤ ~40 lines, extends exactly one class skeleton; no business rules (rules live in fleet/profile/ and in validators) |
scripts/ |
the deterministic implementation: runners, validators, scoring hooks |
Folder name = atom name = registry name — the house <app> join-key discipline
applied to atoms.
Layout
fleet/
├── README.md # this file: registry doc + atom.yaml schema
├── classes/ # the 7 prompt skeletons (PRD agent catalog)
│ ├── sentinel.md
│ ├── extractor.md
│ ├── erp-scribe.md
│ ├── deterministic-controller.md # no-LLM by design
│ ├── analyst-writer.md
│ ├── researcher.md
│ └── knowledge-archivist.md
├── atoms/
│ └── invoice-extract/ # T02 — the worked example (contract only; implementation = erp#40)
│ ├── atom.yaml
│ ├── prompt.md
│ └── scripts/
├── golden/ # per-atom golden sets — land with erp#39
├── profile/ # fiscal.yaml + calendar.yaml + ADC register + validator (profile/README.md)
└── harness/ # multi-runtime harness layer: verifier tests + builder bench (harness/README.md)
atom.yaml — the contract, field by field
Per the PRD atom contract:
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
name, version |
Identity. Folder name = name. version bumps on any behavioral change (prompt, model, validator) — a bump re-triggers the atom's golden-set evals. |
input_schema / output_schema |
JSON Schema for the atom's I/O; enforced at runtime (constrained decoding where the model tier supports it). |
invariants |
Deterministic post-conditions checked by code after every run (e.g. HT + TVA == TTC ± 0.01). A failed invariant quarantines the output — refuse, never repair. |
side_effect_class |
read · draft · write-sandbox · write-prod · outbound — drives which gates and credentials apply, per the PRD environment posture table. |
idempotency_key |
How a replay is recognized (e.g. supplier + ref_supplier + TTC) — a second run with the same key must be a no-op. |
autonomy |
The earned level (A0–A3 on the autonomy ladder) + a pointer to the eval evidence that justifies it. |
model_policy |
Preferred tier, fallbacks, escalation rule, per the PRD model fleet; closed per-atom by routing-bench evidence (erp#45 for the first atoms). |
eval_ref |
Where the golden set + scoring script live (fleet/golden/<atom>/). |
Two registry conveniences beyond the PRD contract fields bind the entry to the rest
of the surface: class (which fleet/classes/<class>.md skeleton the prompt
extends) and task (the PRD task-inventory
id the atom serves).
The worked example is atoms/invoice-extract/atom.yaml
(T02) — contract only; its implementation is
erp#40.
How an atom graduates
Autonomy is earned per atom, never assumed. The levels (A0 manual → A1 prepare
→ A2 rehearse + gate → A3 autonomous + audit) are defined on the PRD
autonomy ladder;
promotion and demotion are mechanical, per the PRD
autonomy promotion gates
(golden-set evals, unedited-approval streaks, incident demotion — the bars live
there, not here). The earned level and its evidence are recorded in the atom's
autonomy field: a promotion is a PR that changes that field with the evidence
linked, verified per the QA strategy's independent-verification rule.
Conventions
- English for all agent-facing files (house language policy).
- Same-change freshness: a change to an atom that leaves its
atom.yaml/prompt.mdstale is an incomplete change. - One capability per file; YAML/frontmatter over prose for anything a machine parses.
- Environment rules (trunk hygiene, read-only prod, sandbox-first writes, promote
gate) are the repo-wide ones:
AGENTS.mdoperating rules +dolibarr-sandbox-writeSKILL.md.