9 lines
1.1 KiB
JSON
9 lines
1.1 KiB
JSON
{
|
||
"at": "2026-08-24T12:17:47+00:00",
|
||
"stage": "pre",
|
||
"runtime": "mistral",
|
||
"model": "vibe -p (mistral)",
|
||
"prompt_sha256": "55fb1db8807c6c55db9cb801abfd9f053df9a32b9de38d42da05fa2107c36b4f",
|
||
"verdict": "BLOCK",
|
||
"response": "VERDICT: BLOCK\nREASON: date_lim_reglement set after invoice date for a 3‑month deferred term violates the stated contract rule.\nFINDINGS:\n- date_lim_reglement 1792706400 (23/10/2026) is based on cycle end 23/07/2026, not on invoice date 24/08/2026; this creates a due‑date gap of only ~2 months from emission instead of the 3‑month deferred price modality claimed for the other cycles.\n- manifested date 1787565600 (12:00) was normalized by the API to 1787522400 (00:00), producing a date_validation before date_creation in the result set.\n- scope creep: change‑set title mentions only M3 deferred, but ops include validation and due‑date update not reflected in title.\n\nRESIDUAL RISK:\n- confirm that the 3‑month deferred term is indeed measured from cycle end (23/07) rather than invoice date (24/08), as this may diverge from contractual intent and prior deferred invoices (FAC005, FAC007, FAC010)."
|
||
} |