--- id: adc-001 title: "KM client invoices under autoliquidation - art. 259-1° CGI (no French VAT, box E2)" status: Accepted decided: 2026-07-18 effective_from: 2026-01-01 effective_until: null supersedes: null superseded_by: null --- # adc-001 — KM client invoices under autoliquidation — art. 259-1° CGI > **Accepted as formalization** of practice in force "since the first invoice" > (PRD [compliance › ADC seed table](https://gitea.arcodange.lab/arcodange-org/factory/src/branch/main/vibe/PRD/ai-back-office/compliance.md#accounting-decision-records-adc)). > The operator's sanity read is the erp#54 human gate; amendments before the PR > merges are edits to a draft — immutability starts at merge on main. ## Context KissMetrics (US) is the sole client: B2B services exported outside the EU. The first client invoice forced the VAT position — charge French VAT, or treat the supply as outside French VAT scope. ## Decision B2B services supplied to a non-EU taxable customer are outside French VAT scope (place of supply = where the customer is established). Therefore: TVA collectée = 0 on every KM invoice; each invoice carries the autoliquidation mention referencing art. 259-1° CGI; the basis reports in box E2 of the CA3/CA12. Applied to 100 % of client revenue today. ## Base légale & doctrine - CGI art. 259-1° — place of supply of B2B services is where the *preneur assujetti* is established. - CA3 box E2 mapping per the T10 mode opératoire (PRD task-inventory § T10 step 1: "box E2 export — today 100 % of client revenue is box E2 autoliquidation Art. 259-1°, collectée = 0"). - Invoice mention checked structurally by the `dolibarr-invoice-audit` skill ("TVA 259-1° CGI"). - Expert-comptable confirmation pending — on the PRD compliance.md § Questions list (PAF documentation expectations for the export invoices). ## Alternatives rejected - **Charging French VAT** — wrong place-of-supply analysis for extra-EU B2B services; would create undue TVA collectée. - **Franchise en base** — would renounce the right to deduct while the company runs a structural VAT credit (all revenue exported, FR expenses carrying 20 % VAT). ## Consequences - Structural TVA credit while KM is the sole client (collectée 0 vs déductible on FR supplier invoices) — surfaced in `fiscal.yaml` `vat_position`. - Downstream rule: `fiscal.yaml` `client-export-autoliquidation`. - E-invoicing: these export invoices stay OUT of domestic e-invoicing scope but ENTER e-reporting on 2027-09-01 (PRD compliance.md § Obligations, PAF row; roadmap § Milestones) — the PAF stays load-bearing for them. - Annexe: the VAT method is disclosed from this record at close (ADC rule 3). ## QA & validation - `dolibarr-tva-reconciliation` classifies every KM invoice in bucket E2 (autoliquidation, collectée = 0) — in production. - `dolibarr-invoice-audit` verifies the invoice mention per invoice. - Expert-comptable review: pending (PRD compliance.md § Questions). ## References - PRD compliance.md § ADC seed table (adc-001) + § Obligations (PAF row). - PRD task-inventory.md § T05 step 2, § T10 step 1. - `fiscal.yaml` rule `client-export-autoliquidation`. - erp#54 (this register's seeding issue).