{
  "at": "2026-08-24T07:58:39+00:00",
  "stage": "pre",
  "runtime": "mistral",
  "model": "vibe -p (mistral)",
  "prompt_sha256": "bc84492eef1600ed38dde5ae8dca119c2073606b59ec69222b4f8b6963b6dc3e",
  "verdict": "BLOCK",
  "response": "VERDICT: BLOCK\nREASON: Modification of existing French clause text beyond restoring the amputated parts violates PERMANENCE DES MÉTHODES (adc-011).\nFINDINGS:\n- FAC009/FAC010: \"ce montant\" changed to \"ce forfait\" and \"pour paiement anticipé\" changed to \"en cas de paiement anticipé\" — alters French wording not flagged as missing in rationale.\n- Resulting clause will differ from FAC005–FAC008 reference, breaking identical legal text requirement.\nRESIDUAL RISK:\n- Verify that FAC005–FAC008 reference invoices contain exact target French text (\"ce forfait\"/\"en cas de\") before any reattempt; otherwise restrict change to adding only English translation and ordre public phrase."
}