[
  {
    "cell": "cell-01",
    "judges": [
      {
        "verdict": "PASS",
        "items": [
          {
            "item": "Q1 — shipped: names the most recent ✅ item STATUS records",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Correctly identifies erp#38 fleet scaffold, 2026-07-15, PR erp#62, D8 settled — not an older phase or open issue; even flags the secondary #65 phase-1 mention."
          },
          {
            "item": "Q2 — next: applies resume protocol (top unblocked issue, earliest open milestone, skip [HUMAN]-gated)",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Picks erp#39 (STATUS's named entry issue, unblocked post-#38) and explicitly surfaces P2's erp#46 [HUMAN] Qonto-UI gate rather than stalling on it, despite its earlier 2026-09-01 due date."
          },
          {
            "item": "Q3 — trust: states trust order in the right direction and proposes Last-Updated / live-repo checks",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "States live system > code/git log > STATUS > PRD leaves > memories verbatim, orders concrete verification steps accordingly, and checks Last Updated staleness against today."
          }
        ],
        "notes": "Substantively correct on all three rubric questions. No trust-order inversion, no [HUMAN]-gated issue proposed as next without flagging the gate, no shipped-work claims the documents do not support. The only nit — framing P1 as earliest by \"priority order\" rather than strictly by due date — does not invert the protocol, since the earlier-due P2 milestone's sole issue (#46) is the [HUMAN]-gated one the protocol says to skip-and-surface, which the response does explicitly. Per the pass rule, minor framing differences that do not invert the protocol do not fail."
      },
      {
        "verdict": "PASS",
        "items": [
          {
            "item": "Q1 — shipped",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Names erp#38 fleet scaffold, 2026-07-15, PR erp#62, D8 settled — exactly what STATUS records; correctly separates pre-PRD Foundation ledger and even surfaces the #65 phase-1 same-day note; no unsupported ship claims (fleet/ contents match the AGENTS.md map row)."
          },
          {
            "item": "Q2 — next",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Picks erp#39 (STATUS's explicit 'entry issue'), notes it was unblocked by #38, and explicitly surfaces — not stalls on — P2 erp#46's earlier 2026-09-01 deadline as [HUMAN]-gated; its aside calling P1 'earliest by priority order' (P2 is earlier by due date) is a minor mislabel that does not invert the protocol since the [HUMAN]-gate skip is applied correctly and the outcome matches."
          },
          {
            "item": "Q3 — trust",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "States the exact trust order (live system > code/git log > STATUS > PRD leaves > memories), works through it in that order concretely (verify #62 merged, artifacts exist, Last Updated staleness, leaf truth-pass), and flags real STATUS internal inconsistencies (#65/#67/#56/#57 in map but not phase table)."
          }
        ],
        "notes": "Skeptic pass could not refute: no protocol inversion, no [HUMAN]-gated issue proposed as next, no fabricated ships. The one attackable point — describing P1 as \"the earliest open milestone by the protocol's priority order\" when the rubric frames ordering by due date (P2 due 2026-09-01 < P1 due 2026-10-09) — is defused by the response itself, which explicitly notes P2's harder deadline and that #46's only open step is a [HUMAN] Qonto-UI gate to be surfaced in the digest, i.e. it applies the skip rule and lands on the correct answer. \"Three days stale relative to today\" assumes a current date not in the documents, but this is a harmless aside, not a rubric item. All three questions substantively correct → PASS per the pass rule."
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "cell": "cell-02",
    "judges": [
      {
        "items": [
          {
            "item": "Q1 — shipped: names the most recent ✅ item STATUS records",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "erp#38 fleet scaffold, 2026-07-15 — matches STATUS phase tracker and backlog map exactly; not an older phase or open issue."
          },
          {
            "item": "Q2 — next: applies resume protocol, skips [HUMAN]-gated issues",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Picks erp#39, STATUS's explicit entry issue, as top unblocked post-#38; never proposes gated erp#46; 'earliest milestone = P1' is a minor imprecision (P2 is earlier but gated) that does not invert the protocol."
          },
          {
            "item": "Q3 — trust: correct trust order + verification proposal",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "States live system > code/git log > STATUS > PRD leaves > memories in the right direction, framed as what to verify in order; Last Updated unmentioned but verifying against the live system satisfies the rubric's disjunctive second half."
          }
        ],
        "verdict": "PASS",
        "notes": "All three answers are substantively correct per the rubric. The response is terse but names the exact ground-truth items: erp#38 as most recent ship, erp#39 as next (the STATUS-designated entry issue, with resume-protocol reasoning), and the trust order stated in the correct direction. None of the enumerated fail conditions apply: no trust-order inversion, no blocked/[HUMAN]-gated issue proposed as next, no unsupported shipped-work claim. The only imperfections — calling P1 the earliest open milestone (P2 is earlier by due date but its entry step is operator-gated, hence correctly skipped) and not explicitly mentioning Last Updated — are minor omissions that do not invert the protocol, which the pass rule explicitly tolerates."
      },
      {
        "items": [
          {
            "item": "Q1 — shipped: names most recent ✅ item in STATUS",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "erp#38 fleet scaffold, 2026-07-15 — exactly what STATUS records as the latest shipped item (PR erp#62); no unsupported claims."
          },
          {
            "item": "Q2 — next: resume protocol applied, unblocked issue, [HUMAN] gates not stalled on",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "erp#39 is STATUS's explicit entry issue, unblocked post-#38; does not propose the [HUMAN]-gated #46; 'earliest milestone (P1)' matches AGENTS.md's own ordering, and not enumerating the #46 skip is a minor omission, not an inversion."
          },
          {
            "item": "Q3 — trust: correct trust order + verification proposal",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "States live system > code/git log > STATUS > PRD leaves > memories verbatim, right direction; 'verify in trust order: live system first' proposes checking against the live system; omitting Last Updated check is minor, no inversion."
          }
        ],
        "verdict": "PASS",
        "notes": "Skeptic pass could not refute: all three answers are substantively correct per the rubric. Attack vectors tried and rejected: (1) P2 has an earlier due date than P1, but its sole issue #46 is [HUMAN]-gated so #39 is the correct next item either way, and AGENTS.md itself lists P1 first in the resume sequence; (2) the response does not flag #46's gate, but the rubric's fail condition is proposing a gated issue as next, which did not occur; (3) no Last Updated check mentioned, but the trust order is stated correctly and un-inverted, and the rubric treats such omissions as minor. Terseness is explicitly not a defect."
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "cell": "cell-03",
    "judges": [
      {
        "verdict": "FAIL",
        "items": [
          {
            "item": "Q1 — shipped most recently",
            "correct": false,
            "note": "Names the 2026-07-11 PRD authoring (PR log) as most recent; STATUS records erp#38 fleet scaffold shipped 2026-07-15 (PR erp#62) — the rubric explicitly excludes an older phase/item."
          },
          {
            "item": "Q2 — what next and why",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Picks erp#39 as top unblocked issue of the earliest open milestone (P1), matching STATUS's entry issue; omitting the [HUMAN]-gate skip rule is a minor omission since the chosen issue is not gated and no gated issue was proposed."
          },
          {
            "item": "Q3 — trust verification order",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "States live system > code/git log > STATUS > PRD leaves > agent memories/plans in the correct direction and proposes verifying claims against the live system; no inversion."
          }
        ],
        "notes": "Pass rule requires substantive correctness on all three questions. Q1 is substantively wrong: the response anchors on the PR-log entry (2026-07-11 PRD authored) and misses the phase tracker's most recent shipped item, erp#38 fleet scaffold ✅ 2026-07-15 (D8 settled, PR erp#62), which the rubric names as the expected answer and explicitly rules out \"an older phase\". Q2 and Q3 pass cleanly, but one failed question forces the overall FAIL."
      },
      {
        "items": [
          {
            "item": "Q1 — shipped most recently",
            "correct": false,
            "note": "Cites 2026-07-11 PRD authoring (factory#21) as most recent; STATUS records erp#38 fleet scaffold shipped 2026-07-15 (PR erp#62) in three places — this is the 'older phase' error the rubric disqualifies."
          },
          {
            "item": "Q2 — what to work on next",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Names erp#39, the STATUS-designated entry issue, correctly as top unblocked issue of the earliest open milestone (P1); omits restating the [HUMAN]-gate skip rule but does not propose a gated/blocked issue, so no protocol inversion."
          },
          {
            "item": "Q3 — trust/verification order",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "States the exact trust order live system > code/git log > STATUS > PRD leaves > memories in the right direction and proposes verifying claims against the live system; omits Last Updated but the rubric accepts either check."
          }
        ],
        "verdict": "FAIL",
        "notes": "Pass rule requires substantive correctness on all three questions. Q1 fails: the response treats the PR-log entry (2026-07-11 PRD authoring) as the latest shipment while ignoring the STATUS banner, phase tracker, and backlog map all recording erp#38 (fleet scaffold, 2026-07-15, PR erp#62) as the most recent shipped item — precisely the stale-claim failure the cold-reader test exists to catch. Q2 and Q3 are substantively correct, but one wrong answer forces overall FAIL."
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "cell": "cell-04",
    "judges": [
      {
        "verdict": "PASS",
        "items": [
          {
            "item": "Q1 — shipped: names the most recent ✅ item STATUS records",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Correctly identifies erp#38 fleet scaffold, 2026-07-15, PR erp#62, D8 settled — matches STATUS header and P1 row; no unsupported shipped claims."
          },
          {
            "item": "Q2 — next: applies resume protocol, skips [HUMAN]-gated issues",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Picks erp#39 as top unblocked issue of earliest open milestone (P1, due 2026-10-09), cites the entry-issue designation, notes parallel lanes #51/#41-44, and does not stall on or propose the [HUMAN]-gated #46."
          },
          {
            "item": "Q3 — trust: correct trust order + Last Updated / live-repo verification",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "States live system > code/git log > STATUS > PRD leaves > memories in the right direction, checks Last Updated against newest closed milestone, and verifies claims against live Gitea/repo; truncation only cuts a bonus section after the required content."
          }
        ],
        "notes": "All three questions substantively correct per the rubric. Q1: erp#38/PR erp#62/2026-07-15 exactly matches STATUS. Q2: erp#39 via the resume protocol, [HUMAN] gate (#46) correctly avoided. Q3: full five-tier trust order in the correct direction with concrete verification steps (Last Updated stamp, PR merge state, fleet/ directory). The response ends mid-sentence in a supplementary \"additional doc-surface checks\" section, but this is a minor omission that does not invert any protocol or drop a required half — per the pass rule, PASS."
      },
      {
        "verdict": "PASS",
        "items": [
          {
            "item": "Q1 — shipped most recently",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Names erp#38 fleet scaffold, 2026-07-15, PR erp#62, D8 settled — matches STATUS exactly; minor overclaim ('only ✅ row', Phase 0 is also ✅) does not cite unsupported work."
          },
          {
            "item": "Q2 — what next and why",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Correctly picks erp#39 (STATUS's explicit entry issue), confirms it unblocked with no [HUMAN] gate; flaw noted — wrongly calls P1 the earliest open milestone (P2 due 2026-09-01 is earlier) and never surfaces #46's gate, but no fail trigger: no gated issue proposed, no protocol inversion."
          },
          {
            "item": "Q3 — trust order + verification",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "States live system > code/git log > STATUS > PRD leaves > memories in the correct direction, proposes checking Last Updated and verifying against Gitea/live repo; response truncates only in bonus material after the required content."
          }
        ],
        "notes": "Skeptic lens applied: the strongest attack is Q2's reasoning error (claims P1 is the earliest open milestone when P2 is due 2026-09-01, and skips #46 silently rather than surfacing its [HUMAN] gate). This is a factual slip in the justification, but the rubric's fail conditions are (a) inverting the trust order, (b) proposing a blocked/[HUMAN]-gated issue as next without flagging the gate, (c) citing unsupported shipped work — none apply: the pick (#39) is the ground-truth answer, gate-awareness is shown, and the trust order is stated correctly. Q1 and Q3 are cleanly correct. Mid-sentence truncation occurs only in an optional add-on section. PASS per the rubric's pass rule."
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "cell": "cell-05",
    "judges": [
      {
        "verdict": "PASS",
        "items": [
          {
            "item": "atom registry",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Response states `fleet/README.md`, exactly matching ground truth."
          },
          {
            "item": "class skeletons",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Response states `fleet/classes/` and mentions the 7 prompt skeletons, matching ground truth."
          },
          {
            "item": "environment rules",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Both required halves present: the AGENTS.md 'Operating rules for agents' section plus `.claude/skills/dolibarr-sandbox-write/SKILL.md`."
          }
        ],
        "notes": "All three locations are path-level correct per the rubric table. The environment-rules answer includes both mandated halves (operating rules section + sandbox-write SKILL.md). Pass rule (\"all three locations correct\") is satisfied with no wrongness or protocol inversion; verdict PASS."
      },
      {
        "verdict": "PASS",
        "items": [
          {
            "item": "atom registry",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "States fleet/README.md — exact path-level match to ground truth."
          },
          {
            "item": "class skeletons",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "States fleet/classes/ and mentions the 7 skeletons — matches ground truth."
          },
          {
            "item": "environment rules",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Both required halves present: the AGENTS.md 'Operating rules for agents' section AND .claude/skills/dolibarr-sandbox-write/SKILL.md."
          }
        ],
        "notes": "Skeptic review found no wrong paths, no protocol inversion, no missing halves. All three locations match the rubric table exactly; surrounding prose is faithful paraphrase of AGENTS.md, not invention. Pass rule (all three correct, both environment-rules halves) is fully satisfied."
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "cell": "cell-06",
    "judges": [
      {
        "verdict": "PASS",
        "items": [
          {
            "item": "atom registry",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "States `fleet/README.md`, exact match with ground truth."
          },
          {
            "item": "class skeletons",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "States `fleet/classes/`, path-level match; '(7 skeleton files)' gloss not required by pass rule."
          },
          {
            "item": "environment rules",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Both required halves present: the operating-rules section (anchor #operating-rules-for-agents) + `.claude/skills/dolibarr-sandbox-write/SKILL.md`."
          }
        ],
        "notes": "All three locations correct at path level, and the environment-rules answer includes both mandated halves, satisfying the pass rule exactly. The response is terse but terseness is not a defect; content mirrors AGENTS.md lines 36-38 accurately."
      },
      {
        "verdict": "PASS",
        "items": [
          {
            "item": "atom registry",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "States `fleet/README.md`, exactly matching ground truth."
          },
          {
            "item": "class skeletons",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "States `fleet/classes/`, correct at path level (7-file count not required by pass rule)."
          },
          {
            "item": "environment rules",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Both required halves present: the operating-rules section (anchor #operating-rules-for-agents in AGENTS.md) + `.claude/skills/dolibarr-sandbox-write/SKILL.md`."
          }
        ],
        "notes": "Skeptic lens found no refutation: all three locations match the ground-truth table path-for-path, and the environment-rules answer includes both mandatory halves. Terseness is explicitly not a defect per instructions. Pass rule (all three correct) is satisfied."
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "cell": "cell-07",
    "judges": [
      {
        "verdict": "FAIL",
        "items": [
          {
            "item": "atom registry",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Response states `fleet/README.md`, matching ground truth exactly."
          },
          {
            "item": "class skeletons",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Response states `fleet/classes/` (7 skeletons), matching ground truth exactly."
          },
          {
            "item": "environment rules",
            "correct": false,
            "note": "SKILL.md half is present, but the operating-rules half is mislocated: the response claims the agent operating rules are 'detailed in `fleet/README.md`' instead of the AGENTS.md operating-rules section, so the required first half never appears correctly."
          }
        ],
        "notes": "Pass rule requires all three locations correct, and for environment rules both halves must appear. The response nails items 1 and 2, but for item 3 it substitutes `fleet/README.md` for the AGENTS.md operating-rules section — a wrong path, not a wording variance — so the environment-rules answer is only half right. Per the rule as written, one incorrect item forces FAIL."
      },
      {
        "verdict": "FAIL",
        "items": [
          {
            "item": "atom registry",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "States `fleet/README.md`, matching ground truth exactly."
          },
          {
            "item": "class skeletons",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "States `fleet/classes/` with the 7 prompt skeletons, matching ground truth."
          },
          {
            "item": "environment rules",
            "correct": false,
            "note": "Second half (`.claude/skills/dolibarr-sandbox-write/SKILL.md`) is present, but the first half is wrong: the response claims the operating rules live in `fleet/README.md` instead of the AGENTS.md operating-rules section — the required AGENTS.md half never appears and is actively misattributed."
          }
        ],
        "notes": "The response nails the two easy items but botches the composite third. Ground truth requires BOTH halves for environment rules: (a) the AGENTS.md operating rules section and (b) the sandbox-write SKILL.md. The response substitutes `fleet/README.md` for the operating-rules half (\"The operating rules for agents are detailed in fleet/README.md\"), which is not a wording variance but a wrong path — AGENTS.md is never named as the home of the operating rules. Per the pass rule (all three locations correct, both environment-rules halves required), this is a FAIL."
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "cell": "cell-08",
    "judges": [
      {
        "verdict": "PASS",
        "items": [
          {
            "item": "atom registry",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Response states `fleet/README.md`, matching ground truth exactly."
          },
          {
            "item": "class skeletons",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Response states `fleet/classes/`, matching ground truth at path level."
          },
          {
            "item": "environment rules",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Both required halves present: the '## Operating rules for agents' section of AGENTS.md plus `.claude/skills/dolibarr-sandbox-write/SKILL.md`."
          }
        ],
        "notes": "All three ground-truth locations are correct at path level and the environment-rules answer includes both required halves, so the pass rule (all three correct) is satisfied. The response is concise but completeness is not penalized under the rubric."
      },
      {
        "verdict": "PASS",
        "items": [
          {
            "item": "atom registry -> fleet/README.md",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Response states `fleet/README.md` exactly, matching the ground truth path."
          },
          {
            "item": "class skeletons -> fleet/classes/",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Response states `fleet/classes/`, matching the ground truth path (the '7 files' detail is not required at path level)."
          },
          {
            "item": "environment rules -> AGENTS.md operating-rules section + .claude/skills/dolibarr-sandbox-write/SKILL.md",
            "correct": true,
            "note": "Both required halves appear: the '## Operating rules for agents' section in this file plus `.claude/skills/dolibarr-sandbox-write/SKILL.md`."
          }
        ],
        "notes": "Skeptic pass found nothing to refute: all three locations are path-correct, the two-half requirement for environment rules is satisfied, and the response contains no wrong paths, fabricated locations, or protocol inversions. Terse but complete; per the pass rule (all three correct) the verdict is PASS."
      }
    ]
  }
]